10/03 - Totally Technical Tuesday!

LOL I just noticed that. I should add that I know it is a man eat man world and if you want to earn anything on here you got to be a little selfish. Of course I am not saying people aren't nice and helpful on here.

 

Title: Visual Perspective Taking Study | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Person Perception Lab [A1B96ZRQ946ATS] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.32] [Fast: 4.56] [Comm: 3.92] [Fair: 4.35] [Reviews: 65] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $7.25/hr] [Pen: 3.00 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Answer questions about the perspectives of two people Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 70;

 

The gist:

 

True. But people still do not understand the differences between
-maximizing your own payoff
-being a dick

If I were given below 2 options, I would choose A and it should not make me a dick.
A) 1$ for me and 1$ for you
B) 50 cents for me and $100 for you.

I am here to maximize my own payoff, not to maximize the social welfare.

 

Yunhui Huang [A2ESGXWA4IHJI1] 3-5 min survey about product evaluation - $0.30 | PANDA

Underpaid

Unrated

Unrated

$5.17 / hour
00:03:29 / completion time

Pros:
Cons:

To read Yunhui Huang's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Disappointed in you both. Could've gone with this:

 

Message from Dipendra Kumar Misra
---------------------------------
I saw your data and you wrote very good, detailed instructions. Thank you




Awww yeah, that sweet taste of recognition.

 

Title: Sort images into two groups(~ 7 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Lupyan Lab [A34Y0INWSLX4AQ] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.68] [Fast: 4.59] [Comm: 3.33] [Fair: 4.30] [Reviews: 95] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Description: Play a sorting game in which you learn to sort images into two groups and answer a short survey Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.90 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Exc: [-602000614-59501] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is one of: US;

 

Title: Answer a short Survey to help pick a Blog Name | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Judah VanSchaack [A1IF7F3E6ZHFEK] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 1] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Description: Answer a short survey to help choose the best name for an Adventure/Travel blog. Please take your time and answer thoroughly Time: 20 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 88; Location is US;

 

The scenario doesn't matter, at all. You're a research participant in a psychological survey, answering the question honestly and by your own brain's guidance is the only correct way to proceed and judging people on the result is unfathomably poor decision making because the survey participant cannot know the true result until after their decision is made, no matter the scenario, if they ever know the result at all. And that is not how good decision makers make decisions.

The "dicks" in the story, if there are any, are the researchers pitting Internet strangers against one another rather than against fictitious characters.

 

Oh girl I say maximize your own payoff. I see noting wrong with being a dick/witch/bad person..heck I was too nice for many years and it got me no where.

 

Heh. Dickwich.

 

dickwich..is that like a sandwich? LOL

 

Could also be another name for having a threesome (if two dudes and a laaaady)

 

Without a qual or a bonus, you just got told you are a sweet guy and she had a really good time.

 

Pepperdine Psychology [AAT5M7A8Z0SI0] Answer a survey about college experiences, own self-perceptions and behaviors along with a brief demographics questionnaire. - $1.00

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$8.05 / hour
00:07:27 / completion time

Pros:
Cons:

To read Pepperdine Psychology's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

So no happy ending?

 

Canadian savagery.