08/16 - Wake up to Wednesday!

MOI ??? HAH!!!

 

Spoiler

 

Title: Long-term Romantic Relationships and Personality (10-15mins) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: ResearchLTU [A2WP3ATUVNPTKU] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 4] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: --/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: ONLY 18+, US citizens in long-term romantic relationship (6+ months) Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 5000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 98; Location EqualTo US;

 

Title: Read a scenario and answer surveys | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: ARRC [A4NJMKW58VXL6] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.77] [Fast: 4.29] [Comm: 3.71] [Fair: 4.62] [Reviews: 218] [ToS: 3] TO 2: [Rate: $14.21/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Read a scenario, and answer decision-making and scenario-related surveys Time: 40 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.50 Qualifications: HIT1-P01 DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95;

 

I think my goal today is a nap

 

Title: Study on Cigarettes in a Hypothetical Marketplace | PANDA Requester: ARRC [A4NJMKW58VXL6] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.71 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.77 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.62 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.29 Promptness Number of Reviews: 218 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: You will complete demographic questions, questions about your current cigarette usage, and current purchasing behavior. You will participate in a hypothetical (not real) purchase task and a decision-making task asking about cigarettes. Time: 1 hour 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: TakenLNETM has not been granted; Total approved HITs is not less than 50; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is US; Study Qualification - LNETM1 is 100

 

I am catching some but except for the 7.50 I wasn't qualified for, it is a huge amount.

 

Are they having a secret meeting without me?

 

Title: Short Survey about Feature Set of an Application | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Katherine Segars [AK7JJACBG8EKK] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 4.50] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 2] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: --/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Give us your opinion about which features of an application you would buy for yourself/others Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Age - 18 - 25 EqualTo 1; Location EqualTo US;

1:45

 

Whew... That $20 research HIT actually wasn't that bad. Probably going to get a rejection though, since it took me a lot less time than their estimate. I thought I was taking too long because I was super duper distracted at first, but once I got to the meat and potatoes it was a breeze.

 

looks like it..they are conspiring against their mom (or owner)..possibly because she is a birdee (and cats like to eat birds). The dog of course is the voice of reason.

 

Title: A Social Network Questionnaire | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Mike Tyszka [A28PNLV80AJ6CK] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Description: Answer questions about your social interactions Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US;

 

Caught 2 JL ten minutes ago and didn't even notice!

 

Title: Family Interactions Study(~ 25 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: UAB Parenting Challenges with Kids Lab [A1NPZ5QNLY4B7V] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Description: 25-min survey about families Time: 45 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.50 Qualifications: Exc: [54218-53629] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 50; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location In US;

 

I doubt you'll get a rejection. It's taken most people I've talked to a short amount of time. I also talked to the researchers and I don't think they're the kind to give out willy nilly rejections. They emailed me back in like 2 minutes yesterday