09/22 - Far-fetched Friday!

Man, how do you guys stick with this stuff? I mean, grinding out low paying hits while you wait for something bigger to come up, only to turn around an hour later to find you've a whopping three dollars? Makes me just want to quit for the day....

 

yes it is - defiantly my favorite show since I was a little kid watching the originals

 

If there's nothing good up, I'll just go play video games instead.

 

Its not really a lot of effort.. My home network feeds all my PCs my personal scraper.

Dealing with the people you're serving it to is where the headache is.

 

Catch me once, shame on you, catch me twice, not happening cuz I muted this tab

 

but would your TH username still be linked to the review on the site? I wasn't sure if you were forcing it to be that way for accountability reasons/content quality control.

 

Make me enter multiple math questions via alert several time during typing the pros and cons if I fail one make posting to the forum mandatory.

 

Title: Earn $0.50 for answering a short survey (3 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Danielle Tussing [AJZTLD657PQPK] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.50] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 4] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Reward: $0.50 Duration: 60 minutes Available: 1 Description: In this study, you will learn about a company and a specific employee there. You will then complete a very brief survey about your perceptions of this employee. Requirements: Employment Status: Employed full time (35+ hours per week) is 1; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.7​

 

Holy shirt you're evil. I was just gonna make the text kinda small.. You should run a stock gambling investment company.

Oh, oh god no. I don't want anonymous reviews. One of the worst parts of TO is that there is 0 accountability/community/leadership, its just random bodies everywhere. I'm sure I'll end up having to ban people who feel the daily thread is where they should take out their frustrations on a review they don't like (instead of just using the flag function on TV), but ...

Ya know what as I'm typing this maybe this isn't an awful idea after all.. hmm yeah I'm going back/forth on liking it / not liking it for a variety of reasons lol. Its not like staff couldn't see who the review was for.. throw me scenario(s) where you'd actually use an "anonymous" (ie your name hidden on the site) review?

 

So how many of us have learned we should not be allowed anywhere near cattle?

 

right now?

 

If a requester has known mob affiliations I would be inclined to submit a review anonymously

 

Or you could just not review them

 

HOLY CRAP

THE SURVEY REJECTION FROM THE OTHER DAY WAS REVERTED

 

But the people must know.

 

I like my kidneys.