10/09 - Monday

dat pending doe

 

All dem rekogs

 

I still have ~8k pending

 

They should have had a screener then.

 

I'll message them and state that,

Though I'm not really too stressed about it honestly. I kinda speed read directions these days so I'm just asking for trouble.

 

Title: Which Product Type is the most relevant? (v3.1) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: OCMP5 [AHEOQ75N66IRM] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 2.58] [Fast: 4.00] [Comm: 1.73] [Fair: 3.11] [Reviews: 21] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: --/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $0.05 Duration: 5 minutes Available: 6885 Description: Which Product Type is the most relevant? (v3.1) Requirements: Total approved HITs is not less than 5000; Categorization Accuracy New is not less than 90; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.7​

if you are unblessed with the qual

 

Most people do though.. That's why they should have had a screener!

I mean, I would word it nicely but I would say something and see if they will reverse it for you. Most people do. Worth a shot but at this point though once you get one having 3 isn't any difference.

3 out of my 9 rejections are from Amazon. Back when they had the shorts ones up.. I marked some boxers as not shorts and they borked me right in the bumm.

 

why am I doing john does?

 

I already sent it off and said for future people, please think of including a screener yada yada

 

3 of mine are the exact same batch, was an mTurk newbie and had no clue any fabric below the waist = shorts lol.

 

I consider boxers the same as tighty whities. So uhh.. not shorts. But what I do I know? It's not like I've been wearing underwear for over 30 years or anything.

 

My first two were from the same guy who had a check box for his hit saying if the sentence doesn't make sense, mark this box. Everyone who did those hits and marked the box (per instructions) got rejected, no contact. Kinda grateful though, it's made me a bit more IDGAF and made more on scared money I think.

 

Because of the anonymity?

 

rekogs kind of did that to me.

Pending 2,585 (96 ≥ 99%) (543 ≥ 95%)

 

I can't even remember exactly what all mine are from but I do know that only one or two of them were legitimate errors. It sucks that there's no blow back on the requester side for handing out rejections like candy.

 

I'm not bitter about having to walk away from those batches earlier. Family comes first.

 

Title: Decide if a 10 sec video segment contains sensitive content. | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: John Doe [A24DF7PQBT4O0B] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.33] [Fast: 4.76] [Comm: 3.40] [Fair: 4.81] [Reviews: 29] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $6.00/hr] [Pen: 0.04 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 67% of 3] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $0.03 Duration: 10 minutes Available: 7873 Description: - Requirements: Location is US

 

To be fair I've made so many legitimate errors and sent off so many panicked emails I probably deserve a lot more than I have It'd be nice to have a bit of a window for newbies for rejections to get waived or something, or yeah, some accountability for the shitbags who do things like my first two.

 

Looks like a slow night so far.

 

Need more batches!