04/17 - Team Rocket Tuesday!

I did the same test as he sent out the first time but I noticed a couple things I did wrong. Last time he told you if you got it wrong quick. This test I sent in Sunday and he said he would tell everyone in 24-48 hours - ding ding. Is that why they are taking so long to approve?

 

No are the actual hits good?

 

UIUC RAD Lab [A397YY1ZFYOS1H] Answer a survey about videos of robots with sounds - $1.00 | PANDA

[3U6BJ3K2CA0ZWM1QLYG8LF28S1EEM4]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$50.00 / hour
00:01:12 / completion time

​

Pros:
I don't know what this was. There were no robots and no sounds.
Cons:

To read UIUC RAD Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I dont know I just sent my test in Sunday and i was wondering why I had not heard back yet

 

G. Scott Morgan [A22WZIUWXLJ30D] Survey about Charitable Giving(~ 5 minutes) - $0.50 | PANDA

[32SRECFMFBG3ZOOSZQPBFXIB1Q6TUF]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$20.22 / hour
00:01:29 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read G. Scott Morgan's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Throwing this back. Too scared money to sink time into. Qual is autogranted btw.

 

Is this one of those deals where i dont get a reply? Cause if you let me know I'm not getting a reply, I'll stop looking for it

 

Title: Give your opinions on a short story | PANDA Requester: Cocolab at UC Berkeley [A1N1YFYVJGJSBR] (Req TV): $14.38/hr (TO): [Pay: 3.82] [Fair: 4.79] [Comm: 4.86] [Fast: 4.83] Description: Read one short story and answer questions about the story Time: 1 hour(s) HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.65 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 50; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US;

 

I have the cornell senior qual. They usually take a day or two longer than stated to pay bonuses and return communication. The batches have been dropping several hundred at a time but the good images go quick so I rarely get on them before they're picked over. I like the image selection hits. I've only seen them twice though.

 

They released the same qual test sunday.

 

And on the instructions it plainly says not to add extra color to the captions but to stick to the facts that delineate the one pair from the other so that email or what ever Chris got really doesnt make any sense

 

What are you guys talking about? I'm new and lost.

 

It's becoming more evident day by day that when you need money to exist and you are trying to do whatever you can to make said money and use this forum as a tool you don't get shit if you speak up and ask

 

Title: Answer questions about a trial scenario | Accept Requester: Social Research UNR [A3IB3BJ4REX7OM] Contact TV: [Hrly: $6.54] [Pay: 2.50] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 1.90] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 1.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 10] [ToS: 0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.75 Duration: 2 hours Available: 1 Description: Read a brief trial description and answer questions as though you were a juror Requirements: None

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.2.3​

Dunno if good

 

Title: Evaluation of synthesized speech quality | Accept Requester: Taesu Kim [A30LO99DNDQ63R] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.00 Duration: 1 hour Available: 1 Description: Listen carefully and rate the quality of speech (1~5) Requirements: Location In AU, GB, US

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.2.3​

3 minutes

 

The cornell quals. They aren't very good imo but it won't hurt to try and get them I guess.