05/04 - May The Fourth Be With You Friday!

I have not followed the convo but SW paint @ 40% off is worth every penny. Shit is magic & makes my no-food-all-caffeine shaky brushstrokes look like Picasso on drywall.

 

UCSC Language Processing Lab [A32MXM9AYO87EL] How can we describe shapes and objects in the world? (~ 40 minutes) - $7.00 | PANDA

[323KIQYDLQJ6D36K3FNGSXUGK594C1]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$25.95 / hour
00:16:11 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read UCSC Language Processing Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

you don't cheap out on paint.

less you want to go through multiple cans of the garbage stuff.

 

Mainack Mondal [AU9HXYTGV7XZ2] Analyzing and evaluating Claims on Social Media - $2.50 | PANDA

[30LCVOSIFXG2NJT3NFMUGZ0XJDI6YP]​

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$17.86 / hour
00:08:24 / completion time

​

Pros:
Decent hourly.
Cons:

To read Mainack Mondal's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

HDCS [A1FKXBQEUHP5EH] Answer a survey - $2.50 | PANDA

[3VHU2SWT3EVZ3TYIRJ7V8DM9GCYSPD]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$22.33 / hour
00:06:43 / completion time

​

Pros:
Excellent pay.
Cons:

To read HDCS's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Northwestern Social Cognition [A1VS8NIUZGMWAF] Perception of Various Social Groups (Research Survey) - $2.00 | PANDA

[3BG0QG8YP8ERYUHJNGRA9ZBGHBCSCH]​

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$10.34 / hour
00:11:36 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Pay could use a little bump.

To read Northwestern Social Cognition's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Alex Gunz [A2E61UNTHETW45] Activities with Possessions Survey(~ 15 minutes) - $1.50 | PANDA

[3X1FWIDHHR0KCWJTQKDF6QJY109MME]​

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$15.08 / hour
00:05:58 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Survey about brands.

To read Alex Gunz's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Victoria Plaut [A1D85MX9Z3H520] Answer questions about yourself and your attitudes toward a university policy - $1.80 | PANDA

[3RC2K8SGD2U58YGWLN948SR72FHXGF]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$16.45 / hour
00:06:34 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Victoria Plaut's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I decided to wash the sheets on the bed in my spare room. That bed has been claimed by my oldest dog and he keeps coming to get me so he can show me that there is something wrong with his bed.

I wish my life was so easy that was the biggest problem in it.

 

i always still need 2 layers (holy wtf idk what word i'm looking for here? theres a proper word for this.. wtf) + primer for a nicer look even w/ SW, but it just looks better than the one time i tried to use lowes garbage.. even w/ multiple COATS COATS IS THE WORD it was still horse ass

SW ceiling paint is meh though. its cheap & meant to be meh soo this isn't a complaint but... unless you actually do pro prep on your ceilings can't just knock down popcorn & cover w/o wasting money.. with that said, if you're willing to waste money it pretty much covers all the sins of being a lazy shit w/o scaffolding i have no point here carry on fine folks.

 

Northwestern Social Cognition [A1VS8NIUZGMWAF] Perception of Various Social Groups (Research Survey) - $2.00 | PANDA

[3BG0QG8YP8ERYUHJNGRA9ZBGHBCSCH]​

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$9.51 / hour
00:12:37 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
No progress bar

To read Northwestern Social Cognition's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY] Perceptions and Attitudes Study(~ 10 minutes) - $1.80 | PANDA

[3B9PUZPHEG1GTEBL3955E0JG374JAN]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$25.41 / hour
00:04:15 / completion time

​

Pros:
-Well paid follow-up.
Cons:
-Still the most inconsistent requester on this site as far as pay goes.

To read Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Is there actually a real ending for each one? I feel like I need to start returning the ones that seem like "someone" salad of non-sense if it's effecting my >70% accuracy. At the moment I'm doing every one I get, even if I feel like it mostly doesn't make sense and I have no idea what's going on with all the someones involved.

I'm especially confused when there's multiple someones mixed with pronouns. It's hard to make sense of who is doing what and what's going on to pick a likely ending. Like when the next sentence has a pronoun + someone, is the pronoun referring to someone in the first sentence?!

Overall I think I'm starting to enjoy the hits. They are growing on me. I look forward to doing more

 

Just do your best I noticed this too during the preliminary steps so that's why there are 2 "most likely" slots, and I still get good data if you mark the computer generated one as #1 and #2. (Granted, I still get good data regardless, because if you mark computer generated ones as #1 and #2 then I have reason to suspect that the example in question is really hard! But of course, if you consistently mark computer generated ones as better then that's bad from my end )

 

I just did a garage with some Olympic paint. I think it was specifically garage/outdoor paint and it came out great. Got a 5 gallon bucket for under $100 and it did two coats. Highly recommend. A+

Outdoor vs Indoor is always different though. I don't care much for the outdoor SW stuff. Also, tried some Valspar bathroom paint a while back when I did my mom's bathroom and it works great with the humidity and steam.

 

Why does everyone want to get rid of the popcorn these days. I like it

 

thanks for doing my HITs! There is in fact a "correct" one for each but as you said, sometimes the correct ones are word salad-y. That's why I wasn't bonusing too much, because I don't want to encourage y'all to skip HITs (from my end it seems to waste time for everyone), and the metrics I was using are noisy. I agree the "someones" are weird (they come from this large dataset of movies, where all the movie character names were replaced by "someone") so at the end of the day you have to make your best guess as to what it refers to

 

wow, nice run of great paying surveys. Hope I can catch a couple!