05/24 - The Lovely Picacho Thursday!

A509 [A3UQ261QVHS82M] short survey about consumer perception - $0.40 | PANDA

[3EULM6QNHF8ZCKMTY5ZFVDQEZZLXJU]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$14.12 / hour
00:01:42 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read A509's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Regan Mandryk [AEOONULLODQWX] Personalizing, adapting, and balancing computer games - $4.00 | PANDA

[3TCGLRK8ZGK7AEK80NU717WORQJZQB]​

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$16.49 / hour
00:14:33 / completion time

​

Pros:
Fair compensation
Cons:
Significant writing.

To read Regan Mandryk's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

What is so great about VRAPI anyway? I started part one of the qualification and read up to the part of "you will not get paid if you don't fi..." and stopped reading.

 

Title: Answer a survey about the online and mobile content you consume. Only 2 minutes [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Max Silverman [A30QVNFVFP8YY4]
TurkerView: [ $15.52 / hour ]
Description: Answer a 2 minute survey about the online and mobile content you consume.
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.25
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThan 100,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95,
• Location EqualTo US,

[33FLRCV02OMDDJ2GFCF9SOK7E9NROV]​

 

does that hourly include returns?

 

So you want requesters that pay people who do shit work that doesn't give them the data they're paying for?

That's a really odd line to stop reading at.

 

Unpaid Screener

 

How so?

 

I like them and so do a lot of folks here. Not every batch is my cup of tea, but I've had my best days from VRAPI and when it's good, it's good.

 

It's something to do when everything else is dead. Some people make ~$20+/hr when they're up. It beats grinding A9s, anyway.

Also, everyone stop doing those A9s, they're no good and I definitely don't want to do them all.

 

Its a line that basically says if you don't do the hit correctly you don't get paid.

I don't see a problem with that

 

and who said anything about "shit work"?

 

I assume anyone that wants to be paid regardless of the quality of work they provide does shit work.

 

hi, I would like a large order of condo vrapis please, extra unit number on the side.

Thank youuuuu

 

'cuz who doesn't want to fire a howitzer at least once in their life?

 

Title: A STUDY ON PERCEPTIONS OF SPORTS TICKET PRICES [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: research master [A30SB1FAUJYKAT]
TurkerView: [ $ / hour ]
Description: Give us your opinions regarding sports ticket prices (5-10 minutes)
Duration: 00:10:00
Available: 1
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95,
• Location EqualTo US,

[31ZZN31VSCX5T3F0SM2RDUXJ7ZIRQZ]​

 

Title: Yanny vs. Laurel: Tell us what you hear | PANDA Requester: MIND Lab [AY0PMAJ0E110A] (Req TV): $41.56/hr (TO): [Pay: 3.80] [Fair: 4.50] [Comm: 2.00] [Fast: 4.50] Description: Listen to speech and decide what you think the speaker said Time: 5 minutes(s) HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.15 Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

The stupidest debate on the internet yet, now in 3 nickles form.

 

I think the thing is here isn't about getting paid for giving bad data, it's spending 20 minutes on something only to realize that it can't be solved, and that you won't get paid since you didn't find it. I don't have that problem though, because I am a super sleuth.

 

Well perhaps I read it wrong, I inferred "if we give you a non find able property, oh well to bad not our problem, tough luck
but maybe reading comprehension is not my strong suit, Thank you for clearing that up