09/16 - Sweet Sunday!

Ori Katz [A2ZESDC6X6M5J4] Questions about Contracts(~ 10 minutes) - $1.50 | PANDA

[33U1175E20SR8VKTRDZINVUGUWCCXW]​

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$18.24 / hour
00:04:56 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Ori Katz's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Alex [A366LLBBFU3A4C] View and Judge Images(~ 45 minutes) - $3.00 | PANDA

[33UIGJTG3O65XXPW4BTYC2K8DKSZ1D]​

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$13.78 / hour
00:13:04 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Alex's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

there appears to be two of them, but I don't know if they are actually the same task. one is (Luv-PBI) and the other is (Luv - PBIwMJGen2)

 

I caught both and was only able to do one. I got the message that my IP had already completed the study or one in the group.

 

Guess I better check my settings, totally missed them. Also surprised that 1000 are gone that quickly.

 

I haven't finished the first one yet

..you see, it's my heart. it's breaking.

 

4

 

I didn't have my panda on rip

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

2

 

sorry about the complications arising from the new format (taking longer to approve and pay bonuses)! and I imagine that it'll be more complicated on my end because the money that you get will vary based on how many questions you ask per image. I was able to pay bonuses + approve work last night, and I'll do the next round either tonight or tomorrow.

One idea that someone suggested to me is keeping track of workers' performance, so as to essentially make a "trusted" category which I can then auto-approve+bonus. I like this idea in theory, though it might take a bit more time to set up and implement, and I don't want it to be confusing to workers. let me know if you have any thoughts

 

i pulled the old ones down a few weeks ago since I killed 2 parts of it so i doubt its web accessible now, all the requester endpoint stuff is the same, I can shoot you the old docs if you need em tho. if you're about to redo it soon lemme know, id like to split mts off onto its own setup to see if i can improve response times for it

 

I didn't qualify
apparently I scored 30 and it needed a score of at least 80.
I don't understand, since I honestly thought I had a perfect score

oh well

 

Are all the East Coast peeps doing okay? Is the worst over yet?

 

Yeah, I was the one who emailed you that idea. It's not even a problem, honestly, that I can't have the information collated for me. It was more of a curiosity thing. There has to be checks and balances to ensure that nobody is defrauding you, otherwise your data is worthless. I think this system may even work to your benefit and help sort high quality data from low quality data. However, if it's going to cause extra headache I think the system you have implemented now is still very fair. I appreciate that you work so hard to ensure that everyone gets what they need/want, but there's no need to bend over backwards. Sometimes you just need to do what's easier for you, and tell the workers to go stuff it.