That's a very good point, Thanks
This will likely sound naive, but I can't help but wonder why people would but their worker accounts in jeopardy to scam a few batches. I mean...
Thank's, that must have been nice. I'm guessing it was abused and we can't have nice things?
I didn't know that info was provided before, was it available right in the HIT info?
[img]
[IMG]
I would make a joke about a hard 11 but that may be seen as inappropriate
If a six turned out to be nine I don't mind I dont' mind
I guess this requester didn't choose it, but it makes me giggle anyway https://turkerview.com/requesters/A2RAGWQ0G2TWAT
Title: Live Group Activity: Pick the Winners of NBA Games -- 3:00pm ET [ caret-down $minus | caret-up $minus ] PANDA Requester: Unanimous A.I....
I'm just being silly, imo most Stanford HIT's are fine, with some stinkers thrown in here and there
Surprising that a Stanford requester's hourly would be so inconsistent :bolt:
[MEDIA]
Well different HIT's I guess I should have said
It seems so, different versions
I mistakenly submitted mine after 3 minutes :flail:
Irish spring next week to hide the smell of 200 bottles of Guinness
Guess I'm the only one that uses Ivory soap and water and leaves it at that :dunno:
You've received a bonus from MIT Political Science for work related to 31SIZS5W5BVPZ53NQ7QSYMME16RRQ6. The value of your bonus is: $0.25 USD...
Separate names with a comma.
