Scripts shouldn't affect load times since they run at document_end. For your incognito test, did you test it logged in or out?
Last update was on 1/30.
52c, 50 for the qual, 2 for HIT. 62c spent to pay you 10c.
More like 3/16 for 29 yards.
Was 190 yesterday. [IMG]
TO progress for the new site. [IMG]
:wave:
Could be helpful.
189 in front of me to get reviewed. [IMG]
Its an old version installed from github. Gotta use the web store to have it autoupdate.
To do that I would have to have people put in their username and password like xport does which isn't gonna happen.
This is just another reason Chrome > Firefox (not the throttling, FF hasn't made a stance on what they are going to do). Chrome Web Store = pay...
MTS for Firefox. Moved a whole 30ish spots so far =/ [IMG]
Its the "<" because of how it gets parsed with direct export on the forums end (starting a new element). Its on the fix list for the Monday update.
I do like that the metrics are provided though. (and stop mentioning mtg, so it completely fails, and i can buy it for $25)
Voted. Also, you should make a non HIT posting based award so I can win it >.>
I'm not 100% sure that userscript themselves will be able to create an always active websocket connection (I'll have to run some testing and...
It really shouldn't be that bad of a hit since its just some listeners, but you never know for sure w/o testing. Like HF was perfectly stable on...
Depends on how you have everything setup. Everything that isn't in its own window as the top tab will be slower. So having PC not as a top level...
Yeah pretty much. It appears that pages with web-sockets won't be subject to the throttle, so depending on a performance impact I can just make...
Separate names with a comma.