If you picked up our Time Magazine PotY hit at 2pm, the swarm for that starts in about 10 minutes!
Our EPL survey closes in about 45 minutes, so if you haven't taken it yet, it's easy money.
Just saw that someone asked in one of our HITs, and I missed it. So in case.... We did both NHL and NBA today because of their scheduling (we...
Certainly. We're getting super-useful data and responses from this, so we're definitely keeping it around. We've also begun to get our processes...
There isn't a setting for that, but I just tested and I can copy/paste the code from that page in a standard Chrome setup without issues. Possible...
And fixed like a cat at the vet. If you already completed it, it's cool. I'll be able to pull turker work IDs one way or another and you're fine.
Thanks Sooner. Lemme fix it for the later crew.
Survey's fixed. Sorry about that.
Not sure whether folks are around on the weekends or not, but we're having so much fun with our daily World Series swarms that we're planning to...
I just changed the end page as well though, so people taking the demographics survey will get a more standard "Thank you" page. Appreciate the...
We are getting your data.
Hey all, if you have our Lifestyle qual from last week, be on the lookout tomorrow for a *morning* UNU Swarm hit for that! Will try to post it...
I'll pass that along to the person who listed the HIT. He's on a call right now, but I think his answer would be "different individuals have...
FYI, I have to focus my brain on NFL UNU at the moment. Once we get through that, I'll see if have some room to add some quals in for EPL. We put...
PM me your worker ID and favorite EPL team.
Yes. Friday is 12 hours away, so you should be able to complete it within that framework, no?
Hey folks! If you have our EPL qual, be on the lookout for a SURVEY ONLY hit coming in just a bit. We're testing a process this week that we'll...
So we've completed our test of our wagering game from week 1, and we're pretty happy with how things turned out! To be clear, the weekend in the...
Either one works. The one we just issued has the error corrected.
Only if you're really overthinking it. ;) It is a little ambiguous, but the context seems reasonably clear. And worth noting: this is the same...
Separate names with a comma.
