If you accepted it awhile ago, it won't be your most recent submitted in the status details page.
But people should be looking at the reviews anyways and not just relying on displayed information from a TO script, review count or not.
On TO 1, all new requesters are subject to that too, along with any requester that doesn't have recent reviews.
I'll clear it up further. I was not interpreting 3.5/5 as anything,. I did not come up with 60% as an adjustment for 5 bombs. I could have very...
Title: Rewrite Limericks in Prose | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Stony Brook NLP [A2CMT426AYB58X] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay:...
[IMG]
Never got a message on there lol. :emoji_joy:
HF is part of MTS, the userscript is OOOOOOLD. Umm, can you get your users here to stop spamming HITs from the same requester and just link the...
No, its to only find work through HN. THis is why you are a lowly turker. If you added a requester to TM, then you are using it to find work.
One thing that would help would be to stop using TM to find HITs.
Experience
The issue is there is no way to obtain absolute data. The percents were made up, so don't harp on the actual numbers. How is there any less...
I'm not saying either are good. But TO2 is better in how it conveys its values. What is 4/5 pay for you? I'm betting its not the same as what I...
It wouldn't be anymore accurate than self reporting though and would be trivial to modify the data sent by a script to TO 2, but you can pretty...
That fix is actually coming. I was testing it last night while waiting for feedback on any bugs that were present in the latest MTS build.
I agree that the wording is bad.
Then nothing changes from TO 1. TO 2 isn't any more susceptible to being gamed.
Then their average would fall when people rate the new HIT.
How?
Separate names with a comma.
