01/18 - Thataway Thursday!

Myself, I am not really into small dogs, just prefer big ones- could be breeds too- I don't like the yapping. But I had a really cool little red dog with long hair and a huge curly tail. I met him one day while sitting in traffic- he was wandering around in the middle of the road- I opened my door and he hopped in (no tag- ck'd newspapers for an ad about him- nothing). I had him for about 3-4 years until he wandered off one day- probably hopped into someone else's car- he was like a travelin' kind of guy. I named him Benny and he had a great personality- he was awesome.

 

Yeah. I’m rarely running HF at all. If I have my OW on 4 and my PC on 1 with nothing else, I still pick up a good deal of pres when I’m only running 3-4 pandas.

When csats are dropping or a batch is dropping, I have to put Ow on 5-6 or I will get more pres than I will catch anything.

That’s just how it’s always been for me. I futzed with everything for so long and that’s the only setup that doesn’t give me a bagillion pres.

 

Yup. I’m usually running 3-4. I miss having 2 pre pools.

Miss it so much.

 

Should still have an HF tabs on most hits with a long timer that affect pres. It's good way to find some decent batches.

 

Sure dad.

 

Errr.... let me try that again.

Should still have an HF tab on most hits with a long timer that won't affect pres. It's good way to find some decent batches.

 

That's right.

 

Spoiler: The Good Place spoilers

Not sure if anyone got to watch the good place or if anyone watches it besides me and a select few but I edited this so I don't get tortured by Chris Turk LOL/SPOILER]

 

Spoilers! :O

 

Oh sorry darn it. I will not go beyond that then..

 

You can say dammit. You're in the bad place now.

 

Neurons are a marker for potential complexity of thought, but it doesn't mean that complex thought is "more intelligent", or that the potential is regularly exercised.

Paranoid conspiracy theorists are an example of people who use their capacity for complex thought ineffectively.

Could you imagine if people pretended that software's effectiveness scaled linearly with the number of lines of source code used to write it?

PHP:

console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("padding for smart points");
console.log("lol we're not doing this in a for loop at all b/c that will reduce our SLOC and make our software seem less effective");


But hey, the headline writer did their job by provoking people with a sensational title.

The voice of reason only comes into play towards the end of the article, as usual: