05/20 - Sweet Sunday!

this might get fun if SCS discovers the block feature and triggers some account suspensions

 

Title: Write a brief comment about a product or service [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: MAD Labs [AH3L9684FUCS6]
TurkerView: [ $23.85 / hour ]
Description: You will write five brief comments about your perception of how well 5 products or services solve a given problem. Your comments will be used in a non-commercial website prototype.
Duration: 03:00:00
Available: 1
Reward: $2.50
Qualifications:

• Location EqualTo US,

[3XQ5ITPVUWP95PY1GPZ4SJYRU6OQT3]​

 

Title: Consumer Gift Study(~ 10 minutes) [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: D Huang [A35HUSM1C26NNO]
TurkerView: [ $13.83 / hour ]
Description: We are interested in measuring factors that relate to how much people like or dislike gifts they might receive.
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90,
• Location In US,

[3X1PO2DV42WKZOTYORMMARDIME2449]​

 

MAD labs

 

I wish the MADs would go back to a 5 hour timer though

 

Same, heck do 10

 

Those kinds of things tend to be ineffective anyway.. you really can't design a system to rule out human error completely. Y'know the saying "they'll build a better idiot" or w/e.

Not saying they couldn't improve the processing logic to help skim out obvious cases of error (trying to bonus higher than your balance? Well that seems strange, maybe we should stop it instead of just processing them until they're broke) but someone would still find a way to fuck it up lol.

Every other service even remotely similar to mturk has payment reversal procedures lol.. generally if you're an intermediary of payments you have to be capable of fixing stupidity errors

Buuuut I'd bet the most used case for it would be reversing payments that went to AA before the Requester checked the data quality.. sooo probably not something mTurk is keen to implement lol.

 

Anyone else going HAM on these museum hits? Doesn't look like they have a history of rejects, just seems stupid easy for the pay. Anyone have experience with their batches?

 

which are those?

 

Title: Research artist diversity in museum collections | AcceptA Requester: Chad Topaz [A3EKYSSEMIO6IO] Contact TV: [Hrly: $8.00] [Pay: 3.00] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 4.75] [Fast: 4.92] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 16] [ToS: 0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $0.30 Duration: 12 minutes Available: 93 Description: Gather data on gender, ethnicity, national origin, age, and other characteristics of artists. Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 99

 

https://turkerview.com/requesters/?id=A3EKYSSEMIO6IO

Why are you neg-repping batches on TV if you're actively doing them 4x faster than your time on TV?

 

tldr fix your review? ACCURACY

 

You are straightforward and simple! Biatch!

 

sorry got distracted: https://worker.mturk.com/requesters/A3EKYSSEMIO6IO/projects?ref=w_pl_prvw