11/02 - Thatched Thursday!

No, the script is already saved and on, isn't doing anything though

Code:

// ==UserScript==
// @name         Johnbronie Doewie
// @namespace    https://turkerhub.com/
// @version      3.14
// @description  blank
// @author       ChrisTurk
// @include      https://www.google.com/evaluation/endor/*
// @require      http://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.2.1.min.js
// ==/UserScript==

$(document).ready(function(){
    // Lets attach a div to hold our YT video.
    $('body').prepend('<div id="playa"></div>');

    // The YT API is pretty easy to play with. We take the configuration from John's setup and plug it into a new player with the settings we prefer (low quality for improved loading speed, faster playback).
    var playa;
    var pheight = playerConfig.height;
    var pwidth = playerConfig.width;
    var pvidId = playerConfig.videoId;
    var pstart = playerConfig.playerVars.start;
    var pend = playerConfig.playerVars.end;
    playa = new YT.Player('playa', {    // the 'playa' here is the name of the div we want the YT script to replace with its embedded iframe. Probably the most important thing to know is that so you can manipulate this script for other HITs.
        height: pheight,
        width: pwidth,
        videoId: pvidId,
        playerVars: {
            autoplay: 1,
            start: pstart,
            end: pend,
            cc_load_policy: 0,
            iv_load_policy: 3,
            rel: 0,
            showinfo: 1 // set this to 0 if you don't care to see the title of the video, I prefer it.
        },
        events: {
            'onReady': onPlayaReady
        }
    });

    function onPlayaReady(event) {
        playa.setPlaybackRate(1.5); // 2x speed, fastest setting
        playa.setPlaybackQuality('tiny'); // 144p, lowest setting I know of on YT.
        //event.target.playVideo();
    }

    // lets delete his video
    $('#video-embed').remove();
    // have you read the directions? If not comment this out.
    $('#directions').remove();
    $('h2:contains(Your task)').remove();
    $('h3:contains(Questions)').remove();
    $('ul').hide();
    $('p:contains(Please watch the following video segment)').remove();
    $('p').css('margin', '0');
    $('#yes-playable').click();

    var p = $('#unsuitable-div').children('p:eq(0)').detach();
var ul = $('#unsuitable-div').children('ul:eq(0)').detach();
var d = $('#medium-div').detach();
var c = $('#fact-div').detach();
var b = $('#unsuitable-audio-div').detach();
var a = $('#unsuitable-div').detach();

$('#playable-div').after(`<div style="width: 100%;"><div id="div-a" style="float: left; margin-right: 25px;"></div><div id="div-b" style="float: left;"></div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div>
<div style="width: 100%;"><div id="div-c" style="float: left; margin-right: 25px;"></div><div id="div-d" style="float: left;"></div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div>`);

$('#playable-div').append(p, ul);
$('#div-a').prepend(a);
$('#div-b').prepend(b);
$('#div-c').prepend(c);
$('#div-d').prepend(d);

    $('textarea').prev('p').hide();
    $('textarea').attr('rows', '3');


});

 

He changed the layout of his HITs and the way they function, the script no longer works.

 

@michaelgracegames another upstate native?

Quick: USC or Clemson?

 

Yeah, I was gonna say, wasn't this shared specifically with the context that it didn't work anymore?

Lol.

 

Nah, whenever I first posted it it worked. Idk when it died but someone else asked about it earlier today lol

 

I wonder whether mine still works. I haven't done a John Doe in a long time.

 

Title: Participate in a study about social interactions: .Approximately 5-7 minutes, you will receive $0.75(~ 7 minutes) | PANDA Requester: NerdLab Lab Group [ATMRMLDNGYDJT] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 3.43] [Fair: 4.77] [Comm: 3.98] [Fast: 4.58] Description: survey Time: 1 hour(s) HITs Available: 38 Reward: $0.75 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Exc: [-381226653-62956] DoesNotExist; Location In US;

 

Nusbaum/Henly Lab [A3S6A2P0HC3OEE] Listen to music and answer survey questions - $3.00 | PANDA

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$13.69 / hour
00:13:09 / completion time

Pros: Better songs than Audiokite.
Cons: TOS Violation (asks for full name)

To read Nusbaum/Henly Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Just did the worst study I've ever done, I can only hypothesize they are studying TRAUMA BONDING because I cannot fathom why else I even completed this thing instead of throwing it back where it belongs. I have a new found appreciation for how admirably well p9r pays after completing this flaming hunk of a turd. Best part is they have a great T.O. rating and it can't be for any reason other than the fact that it pays $6.00 and everyone was like oh wow a $6 HIT! Run far, don't walk, away from The Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience

edit: and to tell you how seriously horrible this is, I'm a person who doesn't mind writing tasks or Inquisit.

 

11 national titles vs 2 national titles

 

Today's Projected Earnings: $14.97
Queue Value: $25.20

 

If you have the qual for this

Title: Select the Funny Words! | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: MSRNE researchers [A1F9W6UY3YL34J] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.36] [Fast: 4.88] [Comm: 4.75] [Fair: 4.89] [Reviews: 146] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $12.92/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $1.00 Duration: 20 minutes Available: 1 Description: Select words that you find the funniest Requirements: FunnyWordsRound2 has been granted

 

Now that Johnny has PC helper for Worker out he said he will be working on PC Queue helper this month. Looks like the transition to Worker is going smoother than I thought

 

Wait until Rhys Lewis posts again. "Oh look a $47 hit..." Fast forward 2 days... "Oh god, why would anyone make a person do this?"

 

Don't know. Don't have the qual, hopefully others do

Title: Survey about reading | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: PRH Labs [A1W2MKEX6QRNV3] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.14] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 9] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $14.25/hr] [Pen: 3.67 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 5] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $1.00 Duration: 5 hours Available: 1 Description: Available only to people who have completed the screener and meet certain criteria Requirements: HCD needs flight 2 is 100

 

Number of football championships University of South Carolina has won: 0
Number of dumbass mascots USC has: 1

 

A lot of surveys have branching paths.

My GF has been through a lot of traumatic experiences and her surveys always last forever because of it (Ironic, huh? They put her through another crappy experience on the basis that she's gone through a lot of crappy experiences).

I always tell 'em, "eh, life's been pretty OK I guess". I don't frame a lot of the shitty stuff that's happened to me as traumatic, and as a reward, the survey takes less time.

IMO surveys like this with branching paths should offer bonuses to people who had to do extra work to explain themselves.

The good TO ratings were probably from people who got the much shorter version of the survey, and varied experiences like this are yet another reason to take TO reviews with a large helping (not a grain) of salt.

 

Why did I post the VT mascot instead of the Chicken?

Because, I'm tired, that's why.

 

Do people really try to co-opt USC for South Carolina? That's really confusing.